Project X Review! Yay!

My brand new show and review for Project X!

Star Wars Episode 1 in 3D Review

Episode#2 The guys review the re-release of Star Wars Episode 1 sort of...

The Woman In Black Review

Episode #1 Cagney tricks Drew into being part of his web series.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 - Action Accomplished

 

Review By - Leo Oliveto

I was fortunate enough to be invited to watch the final Harry Potter on the Warner Bros. lot. This already being an exiting even for the simple fact that it was the conclusion of ten years of something a lot of us have been following. Walking through the WB back-lot made it that much more magical! But enough about that lets get to reviewing this movie. 

There's no need to talk about story or character as these things were pretty much set in stone. Although its worth pointing out that Daniel Radcliffe put on a great performance as his character might have been the only one to have a major turning point. Also, there is no need to talk about the visuals because like most all there other summer blockbusters the effects are truly amazing. What should be pointed out is the great job that was done unraveling the story of this film considering that a major portion of the entire thing is a battle. I believe it triumphed as an action epic where others movies, this summer, have fallen flat. Instead of a non stop, explosion ridden, gratuitous slow motion using three hour bore that leaves you numb; HP7P2 actually manages to keep my interest the entire time and never seems repetitive. This is partly because of the great story but it also has to do with the way the film is paced. The audience is given a chance to breath and digest the scenes and situations. Yet still keeping it interesting by making the slower and smaller moments of equal or more importance as the actual fighting. There is also an amazing use of subtleties. These little gems are spread spread within the most exiting moment and the more personal ones creating a sense of believability, which allows for the audience to connect with the characters on screen. Most epic action movies today seem to focus on flash instead of character causing the audience to loose interest in the goals of the protagonist on the screen. Once that connection of audience and hero is lost the movie becomes pointless i.e. boring. Luckily this film has the opposite effect. I felt like i was with Harry every step of the way! When he hurt I hurt. When he was sad I was sad. When he felt joy I did as well.

Indeed all the regular elements of a great film are accomplished by HP7P2. But its biggest accomplishment by far is taking an action packed film and connecting with the audience with nuances and character. 

 

 

Check out My review as a reader of the books & HP7P2 preview after the jump

Transformer: Dark of the Moon Review

Does the idea of three-story tall robots bashing the crap out of each other appeal to you?  Do you want to watch Chicago turn into a war zone?  What about seeing the most mind-blowing 3d presentation yet?  I would say yes to those questions too.  There is quite a lot to discuss in Director Michael Bay's "Transformers: Dark of the Moon," but as far as the simple should you go or shouldn't you go... well, you know who you are.  This film isn't as obnoxious as the shoddy "Revenge of the Fallen," it also isn't quite as charming as the 2007 original (which outdid “Super8” as a re-engineering the 80s Spielbergian style).  Still, “Dark of the Moon” is precisely of what it wants to be... the most state-of-the-art action epic you have ever seen.

There is has to be some sort of summer movie perfection director Michael Bay achieves here.  A complaint many have lobbed at this film (and the series in general) is that there isn't more to say about these people than what is written on their sleeves.  But imagine if this film was fully animated, in the quality of a big Disney movie, and I’d bet we’d all feel these characters and archetypes were something wonderful.  Imagine Sam Whitwicky (Shia LaBouph), young and plucky, as the heroic Brave Little Toaster.  What about beautiful and smart Carly (Rosie Mary-whitington), Sam's girlfriend, as a supportive princess like Pocahontas.  There is Director Mearing (Francis McDormand), strong and tough, who gradually accepts the help of young whippersnapper Sam, just like the crotchety old man in “Up.”  Bay readily treats his characters like cartoons, and gets a lot of pseudo-emotional mileage out of it.  Do we expect the heroes of “Finding Nemo” to
dwell on the nihilistic feelings a father experiences after the loss of a child for that cartoon to be touching?  Do we really want Beauty to truly inhibit and understand those all-too-human feelings of love when the good-girl falls for the bad-boy Beast?  Do we want our cartoon heroes to plumb real psychological depths in search of truth?  Of course not.  Michael Bay knows this, and is pulling from this easily-expressed emotional tradition.

Bay uses these simple characters as puppets in his constantly moving storytelling style.  Never is there a moment in “Dark of the Moon” where it feels like something important isn’t happening.  Villains are taking over!  Heroes are arriving in the nick of time!  Huge betrayal!  Hold up, here’s a joke, and isn’t it the funniest joke you’ve ever heard! Composer Steve Jablonky’s orchestral score throws out the perfect music que and Bay matches it up with one of cinematographer Amir Mokri’s perfect images to create a strong emotional response, and it happens every 30 seconds. His well-known years as a commercial specialist have certainly paid off.  I don't think another filmmaker out there can build up that much emotion in such a short period of time, even though the emotion is ultimately sort of meaningless, the way it is in a tv ad.

Also of note is the top-notch 3d presentation. It is nice and bright, full of small details, and unlike so many 3d films, there’s never the moment where spatial positioning feels amiss.  As far as I am concerned this is even more impressive than the previous high-water mark of “Avatar.” The overwhelming majority of this film takes place on location, not in a incredibly advanced computer simulation.  Compare the stand-out skydiving sequence in “Dark of the Moon” (a platoon of soldiers jumps out their plane is bizarre skydiving suits and shoot through the magnificent canyons of Chicago) to a similar sequence in “Avatar,” where our lead character flies a cgi bird for the first time.  “Dark of the Moon” is the one that is more exciting; these are real people, the camera is whooshing past real buildings, and that level of reality makes all the difference.

That reality is maintained through the feel of the picture, especially the way the film escalates the story to full-blown war.  Chicago is dressed to look like a third-world battle zone, the torn curtains blowing out the windows, the smoldering piles of wreckage, and shrapnel and dirt overlaying everything.  It is quite heart stopping to see Chicago wrecked to the point it looks like a war zone from CNN.  I liked the touch how the villainous robots are now hiding out in the middle of the desert in a makeshift camp, echoing images of terrorists hiding in the deserts of Afghanistan.

With this terrorism metaphor is certain nastiness in the treatment of the robot’s war, with the bad guy robots being joyously ripped apart and torn to shreds by our heroes.  It’s a little disconcerting in a fantasy film based on a kid’s toy.  In particular is a moment that seems to echo the recent dispatching of Osama bin Laden.  A main villain has been beaten, his weapons stripped from him, he cowers on the ground.  Our hero says something patriotic about freedom, and then blows the unarmed robot’s brains out.  It’s odd, and with an audience that clapped many times over the course of the film, no one clapped here.  When you think back into the movie, the tables were turned in earlier scene where the villain has the hero is a similar situation, but the villain lets our hero go.  The undercurrent is clear.  Bad guys deserve death no matter what.

Listen to the last speech before the credits start, the war of the robots is over.  Yet we listen to talk of how this was “another battle, the war continues...” I was drawn to thoughts of how even with Bin Laden’s death, an obvious marker of what we set out to achieve in post 9-11 war, we are now choosing to keep our military machine in the same overseas wars where we have been the last 9 years, no end in sight.  I am sure no one intended the film to be read this way, the film was written and shot well before the death of Bin Laden became known.  It is odd nonetheless.

All these pieces add up to an overwhelming experience. The constant emotional mechanisms, the intense CGI detail, the visceral 3D effects, the bizarre real-world metaphors... as the end credits began I must admit I was dazed.  Maybe it was that I saw the film in IMAX, and the oversize screen didn’t allow for the same distance you feel in a normal theater.  It took me a good hour or so to recover my thoughts, to even begin thinking about the movie on a critical level.

Keep in mind I don’t intend any of this as a negative criticism, it is more just observations I had.  I am glad I saw “Transformers: Dark of the Moon.”  I would watch it again before “Thor” or “Hangover 2.”  I love spectacle, and I am always interested in seeing what the best technicians and professionals in Hollywood can turn out when money is no object.  With the summer halfway over, no other film appears to be competition on those terms.  You will be fully entertained... which isn’t the same as being charmed.

Check out Transformers preview after the Jump

Green Lantern Review

Review By Drew Sandoval

"Green Lantern" feels like an exercise.  It seems to have all the right pieces; an interesting cast, a big-entertainment director, and a character who has endured 70 years of comic book storytelling.  Even with everything going for it, the film is a constant let down, as if everyone who made this movie just did their day's work and went home.  No one tries to push the envelope, and really deliver something entertaining. 

I've got a feeling most people have a general idea what the movie is about from the trailer, and if not, don't worry because the story is just a hodgepodge of the plots of better movies.  Ryan Reynolds plays Hal Jordan, a hot shot jet pilot with family issues (he watched his hot shot pilot father die on the runway, and now Hal can't quite seem to overcome that fear of death).  A dying space alien, part of an intergalactic peacekeeping force (The "Green Lanterns"), crash lands on Earth and chooses our hero to replace him on the police force.  With the membership comes a magical ring that allows Hal to create anything he can see in his mind.  It isn't as exciting as it sounds.

Ryan Reynolds is fairly slack in this role.  I was actually looking forward to Reynolds as an out-and-out superhero (he was cool in Blade 3), but he feels subdued here.  The qualities I most respond to are his sarcasm, meanness, and his mischievous, almost depraved, sex appeal.  I thought he was great in "Waiting" and some of his other lowball comedies.  Here he tries to be All-American hero, and playing it straight isn't one of his strengths.  He is doing Ryan Reynolds-lite.

The rest of the cast is similarly apathetic.  Blake Lively and Tim Robbins aren't given much to do.  Voice work by Geoffrey Rush and Michael Clarke Duncan is subpar.  Peter Sarsgard, as a side villain whose brain expands and forces his skull into the shape of a deformed watermelon, is almost embarrassing to watch.  Mark Strong, as a strict and stern commander of Ryan Reynolds new Green Lantern team, helps bring gravity to the situation, but it doesn't really help.

Also of note are the curiously uninvolving action scenes.  The director, Martin Campbell, has deliver some of the best action cinema of the last twenty years, with GoldenEye, Mark of Zorro, and Casino Royale.  The primary difference between those near-classic films and this one, is this film has a necessary reliance on CGI.  I don't particularly think CGI is Campbell's strong suit.  For the few moments when we are watching actual physical effects (a car getting flipped down a city street, or a top-secret lab being ripped apart), the film starts to perk up, but then we return to the flying and Green Lantern creations, and the film gets slows for unimpressive visuals and simple action setups.

On top of everything else, the writing itself isn't really up to snuff.  I can see how this property could be something impressive and epic, it seems to be rich with concepts of fear and willpower, a hinted-at backstory of betrayals and victories, and a heroes journey as he overcomes the demons inside him.  However the writing doesn't sufficiently develop any of this, and instead seems content to shoot us from cliched scene to cliched scene.

Anyways, this film is a big disappointment.  It feels as if everyone in it's making was coasting on autopilot, not quite finding the effort to make this film something really special and entertaining.

Check out Green Lantern preview after the jump

The Hangover - Part 2 (Halarious But Lazy....)

This is a quick review so I'll get right to the point. This movie was exactly like the first one. There was no effort in trying to evolve the plot. Everything that happens in this movie has an exact counter part in it predecessor. Still the movie was hilarious. Specially the part with the shemales...LOL! I'm still having nightmares. What did you think of The Hangover 2, let me know in the comment box below!

Side note: Quick reviews will be given to films that don't give me anything to talk about.


Check out hangover 2 preview after the jump...